PDA

View Full Version : Ken Blanchard’s Memo to Managers: It’s Not About You


David Blanchard
10/23/2007, 03:12 AM
Since we share the same last name (though we’re not related), I’ve been aware of Ken Blanchard—co-author of The One Minute Manager (http://www.amazon.com/One-Minute-Manager-Kenneth-Blanchard/dp/0688014291/ref=ed_oe_h/002-8049024-1048808)—probably longer than most folks, but this week’s APICS conference (http://www.apics.org/education/conference/index.asp)was my first chance to actually hear him speak, and it was quite a treat. In less than an hour’s time, Blanchard offered every person in that packed ballroom a chance to rethink their management strategies, centered on his concept of servant leadership.

Blanchard’s keynote address, titled “Leading at a Higher Level,” challenged his listeners to think of their management roles not merely as a job but as a vocation. Every company, he says, needs to be guided by values, and it’s important that you can define what those values are. “If it becomes clear to your customers that you’re only in business to make money, then they’ll think of you only as a transactional medium.”

Instead, he suggests that a company should strive to be:
1. The provider of choice for customers
2. The employer of choice for employees
3. The investment of choice for investors
4. And a good corporate citizen for the community.
“If you don’t want to be all four things,” he says, “you don’t have a good vision.”

That led into his discussion of servant leadership. “It’s not about you,” Blanchard stressed to the managers in the audience. “It’s about your employees and your customers. A servant leader is one who empowers his or her people to make decisions.”

Blanchard gave the example of the Ritz-Carlton hotel chain, which gives each employee the authority to spend up to $2,000 to solve a customer’s problem without needing a manager’s approval. There was a time when a guest at a Ritz hotel in Atlanta discovered upon arriving at the airport that he’d left his laptop behind in the hotel room, with no time left to go back to retrieve it. He called the hotel to ask them to send the computer via overnight delivery to his next destination, where he was supposed to deliver a presentation the following day. The next day, the employee who took the call wasn’t at work. When her manager asked where she was, he was told, “She’s in Hawaii.” Turns out she didn’t trust the overnight service to get the laptop delivered on time, so she took the next flight out of Atlanta to Honolulu, delivered the laptop in person to the guest—and then promptly took the very next flight back to Atlanta. Rather than considering her travels excessive, the Ritz management team celebrated her dedication to customer service with a party in her honor, making it clear to every employee that the Ritz does indeed take customer service seriously.

“Merely satisfying your customers isn’t good enough,” Blanchard says. “You want them to rave about you, the way that guest with the laptop raves about the Ritz now.” To be that type of a company, you need to be able to paint a picture of the future for yourself and your customers: If a customer does business with your company, what can they expect to happen? Will it be a positive experience? Will they rave about their experience?

For those managers and companies motivated solely by financial gains, Blanchard notes that “profit is the applause you get for treating your people and your customers right.”

From one Blanchard to another, well said, Ken.

Milo3
10/29/2007, 03:27 PM
I have no quarrel with Ken Blanchard's vision of employee empowerment and goals for the organization. But this is hardly new stuff.

The mission of West Point is:

"To educate, train, and inspire the Corps of Cadets so that each graduate is a commissioned leader of character committed to the values of Duty, Honor, Country and prepared for a career of professional excellence and service to the Nation as an officer in the United States Army."

So why is servant leadership today's fad du jour from the pundit class? Why is it unchallenged by people that are supposed to be critical thinkers? Could it be that its' built in religious basis shields it from critical assessment for fears of such a critic being seen as intolerant of religion?

The problem that I have with today's current cult of Servant Leadership is the lack of critical thinking employed when they push this stuff. It seems to be an article of faith that this is the only means of being a valid leader today. No one dares challenge it. Such temporal exclusivity is the very essence of fashion or fad.

However, like subliminal advertising, Servant Leadership is a means for the stealth, almost viral placement of these guru's private religiosity; a means for managers to coerce religious ways of thinking on their subordinates.

I don't need to fear some bronze age sky god or other supernatural personae to smite me to make me a better leader, nor do I need any other silly non-rational religious teachings.

As a husband and father, I think I get the stewardship thing.

As a customer, I know what the heck an acceptable outcome is.

As an employee, I've had enough "Don't Bee" Bosses to understand justice, the value of communicating and sharing a vision, and valuing people.

As a Leader/Manager/Supervisor, I've never asked any employee to do anything that I wouldn't or couldn't do myself.

As a human being, I know what feelings are.

Note to servant leader wannabe's, spare us the religious speak, and walk the talk. We'll get it better that way.

Empowering people by eliminating fear and giving them a clear vision does not necessarily require subordination of self, abdication of visible authority, nor does it require any particular religious orientation.

milo3